_Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life_ by Marshall Rosenberg
All mistakes are mine. Hubevents Notes are raw notes from some of the events attended from the weekly Energy (and Other) Events around Cambridge, MA at http://hubevents.blogspot.com and books I've been reading. This is something of an electronic commonplace book.
Friday, November 10, 2023
Notes on Nonviolent Communication
Sunday, October 22, 2023
Quotes from The Dude and the Zen Master
The Dude and the Zen Master by Jeff Bridges and Bernie Glassman (NY: Blue Rider Press, 2012 ISBN 978-0-399-16164-3)
(page 8) [BG] I was an aeronautical engineer and mathematician in my early years, but mostly I've taught Zen Buddhism, and that's where we both met. Not just in meditation which is what most people think of when they hear Zen, but the Zen of action, of living freely in the world without causing harm, of relieving our own suffering and the suffering of others.
(16) [JB] Mark Twain said, "I am a very old man and have suffered a great many misfortunes, most of which never happened."
(22) [BG] An English philosopher said that whatever is cosmic is also comic. Do the best you can and don't take it seriously.
(23) [JB] So I have this word for much of what I do in life: plorking. I'm not playing and I'm not working, I'm plorking.
(31) [BG] In Zen we say that the other shore is right here under our feet. What we're looking for - the meaning of life, happiness, peace - is right here. So the question is no longer, how do I get from here to there? The question is: How do I [get] from here to here? How do I experience that fact that, instead of having to get _there_ for something, it's right here and now? This is it; this is the other shore. In Buddhism we sometimes call it the Pure Land.
(39) [BG] Finally I realized that practice and enlightenment were endless so enlightenment experiences would keep happening. And since an enlightenment experience is an awakening to the interconnectedness of life, the awakening will keep deepening. It begins with the sense of my self being my body, and it stretches until my self is realized as the universe.
(60) [BG] You might call him a Lamed-Vavnik. In Jewish mysticism, there are thirty-six righteous people, the Lamed-Vav Tzaddikim. They're simple and unassuming, and they are so good that on account of them God lets the world continue instead of destroying it. But no one knows who they are because their lives are so humble. They can be the pizza delivery boy, the cashier in a Chinese takeout, the window-washer, or the woman selling you stamps in the post office.
(68) [JB] At the same time I'm reading about the Tibetan Lojong practices, which are basically slogans all about leaning into these uncomfortable situations and opening up to them as if they're gifts. One in particular strikes me: _Always maintain a joyful mind._ Appreciate the struggles as opportunities to wake up.
(69) [JB] So I suggested we do something that my wife and I do sometimes. We sit opposite each other. One person expresses what's on his or her mind and the other person just listens and receives, till the first person has no more to say, and then we switch. We keep on doing that till both of us feel like we're done. Sometimes the shift happens, sometimes it doesn't; it's a jam.
(72) [BG] One day he [Huineng, the Sixth Patriarch] goes to the market to sell his wood and hears a monk chanting a line from the _Diamond Sutra_: "Abiding nowhere, raise the Mind." If you can abide nowhere, you are raising the mind of compassion. So here's this guy who knows nothing about Buddhism, a woodcutter, but when he hears that verse he has a profound enlightenment experience.
(75) [JB] Shunryu Suzuki, who founded the San Francisco Zen Center, said that if something is not paradoxical, it's not true. If you say that abiding nowhere is the same as abiding everywhere, then abiding and not abiding are kind of the same thing, too. It can get very confusing, and true at the same time.
(129) [BG] For me, being at peace means I'm interconnected.
NB: Integrity as peace
(130) [BG] I'm Buddhist, but as you know, I'm also Jewish. The Hebrew word for peace is shalom. Many people know that word, but what they may not know is that the root of shalom is shalem, which means whole. To make something shalem, to make peace, is to make whole. There's a Jewish mystical tradition that at the time of the Creation, God's light filled a cup, but the light was so strong that the cup shattered into fragments scattered throughout the universe. And the role of the righteous person, the mensch, is to bring the fragments back and connect them to restore the cup. That's what I mean by peace. For me, peace means whole.
(137) [BG] Even when people see the value of something, the desire to keep their identity as a conservative, a liberal, or anything else can be stronger than their sense of interconnectedness - even if it means that kids go hungry. _How can I work with a liberal, even if we have the same goals?_ It makes no sense, but the differences can take over. That's what we fight wars about.
(141) [JB] Another practice I find interesting is tonglen. That's a Tibetan practice that helps us connect with others' suffering and our own. I'm kind of a beginning student of it, but one idea I really like is that your feelings are not just _your_ feelings, we all have them. So in some ways, you're a representative of what it is to be alive. As an actor, I feel that I represent a community, the family of man and woman, and my job is to show how different people will act in different situations, like the father in _American Heart_. So when it comes to feelings of struggle and suffering, you're not alone; your suffering is on behalf of the whole group, on behalf of all of us.
(143) [JB] Johnny's [Goodwin] point of view was that A440 is a relatively modern standard of tuning and basically it's an arbitrary thing. [Chris] Pelonis, who is an acoustical engineer, said that A440 is not just the frequency of the note A but is also the earth's vibration. Earth has a basic resonance, and that's why A became the standard. He summarized it this way: "the region of 440 is by Supreme design and not arbitrary or coincidental."
(146) [BG] That sutra [the Heart Sutra] talks about the state of not knowing, so if you're at one with the sutra you're in resonance with the entire universe. Of course, we are always in resonance with the entire universe because we _are_ that universe. But how do we become aware of it? How do we experience? By getting into that space where that's _all_ we experience, where there's nothing but A [the whole sutra can be understood in one letter].
(178) [BG] I have lots of hope. Expectation is the bummer; that's where I get into trouble. As long as hope is without expectation or attachment, there's no problem.
(194) [BG] I've played with changing that vow [of the Bodhisattva] to: Beings are numberless, I vow to serve them. It sounds less arrogant and more possible. But whether you serve them or free them, you're helping people see that there is no one truth, that everything they believe or that others believe is just an opinion.
(199) [JB] And he quoted Tolstoy: "As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields."
(200) Marian Kolodziej, Catholic Pole who was one of the first prisoners in Auschwitz and later painted murals of the barracks in Oswiecim, "The Labyrinth."
(206) [JB] Many people think about children as their immortality. She [Bridges' mother] said that they're really closer to your mortality. When you have a child, you have another pair of eyes, another heart that you love more than your own, but you have no control over them.
(233) [BG] Being a Zen teacher, I know that frustrations come out of expectations, but in this case [Israeli/Palestinian peace] I was really attached to seeing big changes.
(257-258) [JB] Buddhist Five Remembrances
I am of the nature to grow old. There is no way to escape growing old.
I am of the nature to have ill health. There is no way to escape ill health.
I am of the nature to die. There is no way to escape death.
All that is dear to me and everyone I love are of the nature to change. There is no way to escape being separated from them.
My actions are my only true belongings. I cannot escape the consequences of my actions. My actions are the ground upon which I stand.
from _Plum Village Chanting Book_ by Thich Nhat Hanh
Tuesday, October 10, 2023
Facing the Emotional Reality of Accelerating Climate Transformations
Once you know: growing our capacity to face darkening climate predictions
2023 Charles D Keeling Memorial Lecture, Scripps Institution of OceanographyMay 8, 2023
Lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6pCZ1-K0To
Moser first learned of climate change in 1985
"We're moving outside the range of the familiar in terms of frequency, intensity, and how expensive they are."
growing acknowledgment of mental health threats from climate
extreme heat causes people to be more aggressive
"It is really intense how domestic violence and abuse of children goes up in those [climate] events: any time another storm hits, a man hits a woman" is a bitter irony known among those who work in that field
Climate change is not the same for everybody, the people who did the least to cause the problems and least able to navigate climate change are hurt worse and have to look at the effects almost constantly.
Is This How You Feel - letters from scientists to the future on climate
https://www.isthishowyoufeel.com
"Climate change doesn't capture what's happening here... We're dealing systems collapsing. A complete shift... It is impacting everything - culturally, ecologically, economically." Gay Sheffield
How do you go home knowing that?
In some way this is toxic knowledge.
what is meaningful work on the way down?
local officials are key
people don't learn about trauma informed communications
the same people who are trying to work with the whole community on climate/resilience are part of the government which is perpetrating police violence and callous social policies on those very marginalized people who need the most help.
How do we know all this about climate and not do something?
Those for whom the apocalypse is their day job are predominantly women (hence, double, triple burdens)
fear of spreading "doom" and despair, obsession with (easy) hope... personal attacks (including threats to life, work, reputation, person)
'The challenge
A world of rapid and constant and complex change with great uncertainty, unknowing and surprises; more frequent and pervasive traumatic disruptions for more and more people; inevitable (chosen and/or imposed) transformative change."
The Adaptive Mind Project (http://www.susannemoser.com/documents/AdaptiveMindOverview5-27-19.pdf pdf alert) building the skills needed for coping with transformative change while reducing their own trauma and trauma to others.
First ask is simple acknowledgment [that climate change is already here and we are suffering it.]
Adaptive mind is not just in individuals but in the community [including non-humans]
community care [not just individuals or nuclear families]
"We are so imagination challenged and we cannot imagine that there is a future that's not just a doom future."
"Covid showed us how quickly we can change and how little stamina we have."
We need to learn more about how social change can happen.
Acknowledge the doom and gloom and move from there
Tuesday, July 11, 2023
Notes on Samuel R Delany's Times Square Red, Times Square Blue
Samuel R Delany's book on urban development issues, Times Square Red, Times Square Blue (New York University Press, 1999) brings his astute and engaging science fiction writer eye to the topic. He has a kind of Victorian erudition coupled with all the tools of post-modern deconstruction and political discourse.
He relates his experiences over nearly thirty years in Times Square talking with the homeless and the hustlers, the small businessmen and their customers, the denizens of the porno theaters he frequented and makes a strong case that the "redevelopment" that has pushed most of these folks out of the area is based upon a fear of contact (as opposed to networking) and especially any contact across class lines. By remaking Times Square into something like a mall that is always tourist-friendly, Delany believes that all of us will become tourists even in our own communities. As a black homosexual, he has an unique perspective based upon his survival observations of a mostly white, heterosexual culture.
(pages 149 - 152) The generally erroneous assumption about how new buildings make money is something like this: A big company acquires the land, clears it for construction, and commences to build. After three to five years, when it is complete, the company rents the building out. If the building is a success, all the offices (or apartments, as the case may be) are leased, and the site is a popular one, then and only then does the corporation that owns the building begin to see profits on its earlier outlays and investments. Thus the ultimate success of the building as a habitation is pivotal to the building's future economic success.
If this were the way new office buildings were actually built, however, few would even be considered, much less actually begun.
Here is an only somewhat simplified picture of how the process _actually_ works. Simplified though it is, it gives a much better idea of what on and how money is made. A large corporation decides to build a building. It acquires some land. Now it sets up an extremely small ownership corporation, which is tied to the parent corporation by a lot of very complicated contracts - but is a different and autonomous corporation envertheless. That ownership corporation, tiny as it might be, is now ready to build the building. The parent corporation also sets up a much larger construction corporation, which hires diggers, subcontracts construction companies, and generally oversees the building proper.
The little ownership corporation now borrows a lot of money from a bank - enough to pay the construction corporation for constructing the building proper. The small ownership corporation also sells stock to investors - enough to pay back the bank loan. The tiny ownership corporation (an office, a secretary, and a few officers that oversee things) proceeds to pay the parent construction corporation with the bank funds to build the building. It uses the stock funds to pay back the bank. Figured in the cost of the building is a healthy margin of profits for the construction corporation - and for the large corporation that got the whole project started - while the investors pay off the bank, so that _it_ doesn't get twisted out of shape. Meanwhile both the ownership corporation and construction corporation pay the parent corporation as their controlling stockholder.
Yes, if the building turns out to be a stunningly popular address, then (remember all those contracts?) profits will be substantially greater than otherwise. But millions and millions of dollars of profits will be made by the parent corporation just from the construction of the building alone, even if no single space in it is ever rented out. (Movies are made in the same manner, which is why so many awful ones hit the screen. By the time they are released, the producers have long since taken the money and, as it were, run.) Believing in the myth of profit only in return for investments, public investors will swallow the actual cost of the building's eventual failure - if it fails - while the ownership corporation is reduced in size to nothing or next to nothing: an office in the building on which no rent is paid, a secretary and/or an answering machine, and a nominal head (with another major job somewhere else) on minimal salary who comes in once a month to check in ... if that.
Two facts should now be apparent.
First fact: The Forty-second Street Development Project (I use this as a metonym for the hidden corporate web behind it) _wants_ to build those buildings. Renting them out is secondary, even if the failure to rent them is a major catastrophe for the city, turning the area into a glass and aluminum graveyard.
A truth of high finance tends to get away from even the moderately well-off investor (the successful doctor or lawyer, say, bringing in two to four hundred thousand a year), though this truth is, indeed, what makes capitalism: In short-term speculative business ventures of (to choose an arbitrary cutoff point) more than three million dollars, such as a building or civic center, (second fact) the profits to be made from dividing the money up and moving it around over the one to six years during which that money must be spent easily offset any losses from the possible failure of the enterprise itself as a speculative endeavor, once it's completed.
The interest on a million dollars at 6.5 percent is about 250 dollars a _day_; on a good conservative portfolio it will be 400 dollars a day. The interest on ten million dollars is ten times that. Thus the interest on ten million dollars is almost a million and a half a year. The Forty-second Street Development Project is determined to build those buildings. The question is: How long will it take to convince investors to swallow the uselessness of the project?
Far more important than whether the buildings can be rented out is whether _the investors think the buildings can be rented out_. In the late seventies, three of those towers were tabled for ten years. The ostensible purpose for that ten-year delay was to give economic forces a chance to shift and business a chance to rally to the area. The real reason, however, was simply the hope that people would forget the arguments against the project, so clear in so many people's minds at the time. Indeed, the crushing arguments against the whole project from the mid-seventies were, by the mid-eighties, largely forgotten; this forgetting has allowed the project to take its opening steps over the last ten years. The current ten-year delay means that public relations corporations have been given another decade to make the American investing public forget the facts of the matter and convince that same public that the Times Square project is a sound one. It gambles on the possibility that, ten years from now, the economic situation might be better - at which point the developers will go ahead with those towers, towers which, Stern has told us, _will_ be built."
(121) Given the mode of capitalism under which we live, life is at its most rewarding, productive, and pleasant when large numbers of people understand, appreciate, and seek out interclass contact and communication conducted in a mode of good will.
The class war raging constantly and often silently in the comparatively stabilized societies of the developed world perpetually works for the erosion of the social practices through which interclass communication takes place and of the institutions holding those practices stable, so that new institutions must always be conceived and set in place to take over the jobs of those that are battered again and again till they are destroyed.
While the establishment and utilization of those institutions always involved social practices, the effects of my primary and secondary theses are regularly perceived at the level of discourse. Therefore, it is only by a constant renovation of the concept of discourse that society can maintain the most conscientious and informed field for both the establishment of such insitutions and practices and, by extension, the necessary critique of those institutions and practices - a critique necessary if new instittuions of any efficacy are to be established. At this level, in its largely stabilizing/destabilizing role, superstructure (and superstructure at its most oppositional) _can_ impinge on infrastructure."
(123 -124) Contact is the conversation that starts in the line at the grocery counter with the person behind you while the clerk is changing the paper roll in the cash register. It is the pleasantries exchanged with a neighbor who has brought her chair out to take some air on the stoop. It is the discussion that begins with the person next to you at a bar. It can be the conversation that starts with any number of semiofficials or service persons - mailman, policeman, librarian, store clerk or counter person. As well, it can be two men watching each other masturbating together in adjacent urinals of a public john - an encounter that, later, may or may not become a conversation. Very importantly, contact is also the intercourse - physical and conversational - that blooms in and as 'casual sex' in public rest rooms, sex movies, public parks, singles bars, and sex clubs, on street corners with heavy hustling traffic, and in the adjoining motels or the apartments of one of another participant, from which nonsexual friendships and/or acquaintances lasting for decades or a lifetime may spring, not to mention the conversation of a john with a prostitute or hustler encountered on one of another street corner or in a bar - a relation that, a decade later, has devolved into a smile or a nod, even when (to quote Swinburne) 'You have forgotten my kisses/And I have forgotten your name.' Mostly, these contact encounters are merely pleasant chats, adding a voice to a face now and again encountered in the neighborhood."
(128 -129) There is, of course, another way to meet people. It is called _networking_. Networking is what people have to do when those with like interests live too far apart to be thrown together in public spaces through chance and propinquity. Networking is what people in small towns have to do to establish any complex cultural life today.
But contemporary _networking_ is notably different from _contact_.
At first one is tempted to set contact and networking to opposition. Networking tends to be professional and motive-driven. Contact tends to be more broadly social and appears random. Networking crosses class lines only in the most vigilant manner. Contact regularly crosses class lines in those public spaces in which interclasss encounters are at their most frequent. Networking is heavily dependent on institutions to promote the necessary propinquity (gyms, parties, twelve-step programs, conferences, reading groups, singing groups, social gatherings, workshops, tourist groups, and classes), where those with the requisite social skills can maneuver. Contact is associated with public space and the architecture and commerce that depend on and promote it. Thus contact is often an outdoor sport; networking tends to occur indoors."
(127) [Jane Jacobs] dismisses "pervert parks" as necessarily social blights (largely understandable in the pre-Stonewall 1950s when she was collecting material for her book, but nevertheless unfortunate), though she _was_ ready to acknowledge the positive roles winos and destitute alcoholics played in stabilizing the quality of neighborhood life at a _higher_ level than the neighborhood would maintain without them.
"I would recommend her analysis, though I would add that, like so much American thinking on the left, it lacks not so much a class analysis as an _interclass_ analysis."
Editorial Comment: Somewhere I should have notes on Jane Jacobs' _Life and Death of Great American Cities_.
Monday, June 19, 2023
Joan Didion: We Tell Ourselves Stories in Order to Live
(875) Perhaps because not all of the experts, authorities, and spokespersons driving this news had extensive experience with the kind of city-side beat on which it is taken for granted that the D. A.'s office will leak the cases they doubt they can make, selective prosecutorial hints had become embedded in the ongoing story as fact.
Sunday, March 26, 2023
Notes on The Persuaders
_The Persuaders: at the Front Lines of the Fight for Heartsm Minds, and Democracy_ by Anand Giridharadas
NY: Alfred A Knopf, 2022ISBN 9780593318997
(7) “The IRA [Internet Research Agency] knows that in political warfare disgust is a much more powerful tool than anger,” [Darren] Linvill and [Patrick] Warren have written. “Anger drives people to the polls, disgust drives countries apart.”
(33-34) “The thing about our movement is that we’re too woke,” [Linda] Sarsour told me, “which is why we don’t have mass mobilization in the way that we should,” In choosing the word “woke,” she was using a term that once had real meaning in a Black radical tradition - “Today our very survival depends on oiur ability to stay awake, to adjust to new ideas, to remain vigilant and to face the challenge of change,” Dr King once said - and had since been co-opted by the political right as a catchall label for the more pluralist, egalitarian future than many white people feared.
(48) The problem she [Loretta Ross] observed with one’s 90-percenters is that instead of focusing on the vast overlap, they fixated on the 10 percent divergence.
(49) For an activist who works in coalition, 75-percenters require a further skill beyond what 90-percenters do. You don’t merely have to tolerate others focising on different things, attacking a broadly similar vision of the prolbem in their own, distinct way. You have to accept large islands of disagreement in a sea of assent. With your 75-percenters, there is still so much you can get done together. But [Loretta] Ross obsreved an excessive interest in that nonoverlapping 25 percent. It was a scab people wanted to keep picking instead of doing the things they could do.
…You approach those people [50-percenters] by first accepting they don't want the world you want. Their vision is different. But if you can understand their values and needs and look for openings, as when Ross’s father fell into dread about his health care, you can, in addition to helping them, pry open a closed mind.
(50) You have to spend a lot of time on the concept of fear, because a lot of people, particularly in that 25-percenter category, operate from platforms of fear,” she [Loretta Ross] told me. “Fear of immigrants, fear of queers, fear of this, fear of that. And so you can have really productive conversations talking about their fears, but you have to take their fears seriously for them to even be able to listen to you. If you dismiss their fears, they don’t listen. They don’t think you’re taking the fact that they’re afraid seriously enough."
(51) Loretta Ross: “I think as part of the movement to end violence against women, we made some overpromises. We told people, particularly rape survivors, that we could create safe spaces, when in fact all we can do is create spaces to be brave together."
(55) She told them before they worry about those they were trying to win over, they should look at themselves. "You have to be in a loving, healing space to call anybody in,” [Loretta] Ross told me. “You can’t do it from anger, because it's just going to end up badly. So you have to asess why you’re doing it. What’s your motivation? Are you trying help this person learn, or are you actually trying to change them?”
Movement Building
(70) Alicia Garza: … the longer I’m in the practice of building a movement, the more I realize that movement building isn’t about finding your tribe - it’s about growing your tribe across difference to focus on a common set of goals.
(71) Progressives, Garza said, too often seek out united fronts when, in fact, they should be forging popular fronts. Drawing on Marx, she defines popular fronts as “alliances that come together across a range of political beliefs, for the purpose of achieving a short- to intermediate-term goal, while united fronts are long-term alliances based on the highest level of political alignment."
(74) Alicia Garza: So the moral of this story is how you make people feel matters. And sometimes part of our purist cultre can be not having room for the waking among the work. And because of that, we just kind of keep circulating among the woke. Forgeting that the whole point is not to be cliques.
(102) Kurt [white father of an adopted Afro-American child]: “I think the Black community will go, ‘Great, big deal. We've been grieving for hundreds of years. So yay! Congratulations. Nice work, Suck it up, Change. Let’s go.’”
NB: But where do we go, what do we do, what is our defined task and common vision?
(119) Personal narrative and emotional appeals were how a politics that presented like change but avoided real change were sold to people, so they wouldn’t notice how little they were getting.
(148) Ben McDonald: “Whenever you confront somebody and you win, don’t walk away from the table. Always give them the golden gate of retreat.”
The point was not that you let the other side advance. The word “retreat” was key. That was the intransigent part. You needed your vision of progress to prevail over theirs. What was up for grabs was how it would go down. Retreat itself was not negotiable, but there could always be ways of their retreating that bred resentment and made the conflict live on forever and other ways of retreating that made those who had lost or had changed their mind feel considered and seen, feel that they still had their dignity intact, which allowed them to let go of having to be right and having to win.
(192) AOC: “Some people are of the belief that electoralism is broken beyond repair and it is a dead end when you look at the profound influence of dark money and X, Y, Z ways that American democracy is fragile, imperiled, or broken. The thing I keep coming back to is that it really isn’t one or the other. It’s that we need each other.
“Ther are certain things that can be accomplished electorally that simply cannot be done with grassroots organizing,” she continued. “There are some things that can be done with collective mass movement that will never be accomplished through electoral means. And, in fact, going beyond that binary, both of these types of work and organizing are necessary for the success of the other. Yet you will have hard-liners in both categories.”
NB: “Use EVERYTHING!” as my old martial arts teacher would exhort us. And there are more than just electoral politics and mass movements.
(202) AOC: I don’t value the things you think I value. That precisely is the source of power. The thing they fear the most is what they don’t control.
Anat Shenker-Osorio
(220) The ranks of the persuadable change from issue to issue, year to year. But [Anat] Shenker-Osorio thinks about it as a rule of 20-60-20. When you ask people to rate their support for various issues (as opposed to parties, about which people are far more partisan and tribal), a fifth of people are committed to your side, a fifth of people are reliably for the opposition; most people are “moderate,” which is to say their minds are in play.
(226) Something struck her. On Luntz’s tests, which tracked the attitude of base, opposition, and moderates listening to a message, the winning one was defined as that which raised base approval, raised moderate approval, and _reduced_ opposition approval. Not the message that raised all three.
…It was that you should seek out ways to please your base, get it chanting in ways that encircled and wooed the persuadables, and, at the same time, alienate and marginalize the opposition. The left needed, if you’ll pardon the expression, to dial for blue meat.
(228) To sum up the [Anat] Shenker-Osorio method thus far: Don’t dilute the vision to reach out to a middle that isn’t in the middle but is confused. Thrill your base; alienate the people who aren’t going to vote for you anyway but will do you the favor, if you’re setting the rhetorical agenda, of yelling your ideas all over town. Don’t be afraid to call out, to woo the right people and drive away the right people. And there was more. These callouts, she argued, needed to be nested within a positive galvanizing mission that her allies on the left too often forget to include while deploring problems.
(231) Voters aren’t stirred to reduce harm, Shenker-Osorio said. They’re motivated to create good.
...“Paint the beautiful tomorrow”
…”The entire premise of my work is, ’Say what you’re for.’ The rest is commentary.”
(231-232) “I genuinely believe,” she continued, “it is a Republican wet dream that they have us talking constantly about everything that we oppose because (a) it gives them more airtime, (b) it scares the shit out of people, and when people are afraid, what they seek is a more authoritarian, more restrictive, more conservative kind of leadership and structure, (c) it has us not speak about what we’re for.” She joked with colleagues that despite all her research into the nuances of different messages, there was really just one winning message for her side. “That message is, ‘We can have nice things.’"
(235) “What you fight,” [Anat] Shenker-Osorio likes to say, “you feed.”
NB: Taoism, aikido
(238) … the fight (for voting rights) should be characterized as seeking the freedom to vote.
… “We should care for our land, we should care for our earth, because it’s the American way. It’s what we’ve always done.” To her ear, this sounded off, because tradition, doing something because it’s what we’ve always done, is a frame that will never benefit the progressive left.
(240) The message ordering [Anat] Shenker-Osorio suggests instead goes like this: shared value, problem, solution.
… A fundamental thing many people who disagree with you share with you is the desire to feel like good people. If the message is venturing into challenging territory, it helps to ground it first in a shared belief.
(249) What the recent surveys showed was that when you asked Americans of all persuasions what values they most cared about, freedom consistently topped the list… “This really, truly is, over and again, the core value Americans associate with this country,” Shenker-Osorio told the the group…
NB: Freedom from or freedom for?
(253) Shenker-Osorio: “We don’t have time to be genuflecting at the altar of bipartisanship, and pretending that Republicans are a party, that they are anything other than an authoritarian faction. We do not have time.”
(256) An astonishing 17 percent of Americans were said to be QAnon believers now [as of 2021]
Deprogramming Cultification
(259) Once again, they [deprogrammers after Diane Benscoter was with the Moonies] weren’t trying to make her believe anything particular in that moment. They were illustrating the anatomy of brainwashing in general. It was helpful that the manipulation in question had nothing to do with the Moonies, belonging to a completely alien situation. People have less elaborate fencing systems to protect them from ideas on subjects they have little investment in. So she could see the art of manipulation more clearly and objectively. And then, having seen it, she could begin to make connections herself.
…Attempting to persuade her [Diane Benscoter] of new beliefs - of better biblical interpretations - hadn’t worked. But making space for new beliefs to enter by deflating the old ones was more effective.
(262) Where cults thrived, something in the society wasn’t working right.
(266) [Diane] Benscoter set up a nonprofit called Antidote, and these days it is in the early phase of a potentially vast project on how societies can vaccinate citizens against the virus of cults, disinformation, and manipulation.
… She wants to develop educational videos that might wake cult victims up, by playing on the only desire she has found can compete with the desire to have the world explained simply and totally - the desire not to be conned. She imagines video listicles like “Ten ways to tell if you;re being psychologically manipulated."
(268) John Cook, Monash University “a systematic, step-by-step process for identifying fallacies”: https://skepticalscience.com/Resoruces-to-give-facts-a-fighting-chance-against-misinformation.html
(271) Cook’s website Skeptical Science: https://skepticalscience.com/
(273) Why couldn’t the opponents of misinformaiton do the same? Instead of answering disinformation with better information, try to discredit the misinformers! It was in keeping with what [Diane] Benscoter had experienced when the efforts to replace her beliefs with truer belifes had failed, but then the warning that she had been deceived by unscrupulous people using unscrupulous methods had worked.
(285) He [Cesar Torres] was the guy who tried to tell himself what John Cook had argued: that the crazies weren’t perpetrators so much as victims of a society awash in mis- and disinformation.
Deep Canvassing
(299) “Over time,” [Steve] Deline continued, “it became cleat that, ‘Oh, all of these answers we’re trying to give aren’t helping.’ We can try to answer people’s concerns with facts and information. And their fears about gay people, and about their church being forced to do something, and their righteous indignation about lefties pushing things on them - there’s no answer we can give that dispels these fears. They’re actually in a place where they're wrestling with some deeply seated emotions. The thing that actually made a different was inviting them to talk about their lives, and then things they've experienced and their stories, and sharing our stories.
(300) [Steve] Deline and his fellow canvassers didn’t think of themselves as being divided against their targets on the other side of the doors so much as they thought of their targets as being divided against themselves. They saw tham as being lost, grasping. It was another way of saying that Shenker-Osorio had described about the swing voter being confused, not centrist. (She would eventually advise deep canvassing effforts around the 2020 elections.) The canvasser’s opportunity wasn't to implant something of their own, something foreign to the target, into them. Rather, it was to pit some things going on inside them against other things going on inside them, to get them to re-rank these things.
NB: Another possibility is to approach people as if we are all confused and trying to figure it out so let’s do it together. As if we had a common positive vision.
(301) First, the canvasser was to make contact
Second, the canvasser was to create a “nonjudgmental context.”
(302) Vox: “The new research shows that if you want to change someone’s mind, you need to have patience with them, ask them to reflect on their life, and listen. It’s not about calling people out or labeling them fill-in-the-bland-phobic. Which makes it feel like a big departure from a lot of the current political dialogue.”
… Third, the canvasser was to exchange personal narratives…
… Fourth, the canvasser was to invite the analogic perspective taking. Was there a time _you_ needed support. Was there a time _you_ needed health care but struggled to access it?
… Fifth, the canvasser was to make an explicit case. Here, after doing much listening and eliciting, the canvasser spoke more openly of their own feeloings about the subject at hand.
… Sixth, the canvasser, having sown some cognitive dissonance, was to seek to help the subject wrestle with it out loud.
(303) Seventh, and only seventh, the canvasser was to respond to the subject’s concerns with talking points and facts. As Deline had observed, this seventh step was step one for many amateurs.
… “Only after rapport had been established and stories shared would canvassers address concerns.” To be fact-checked, in other words, had prerequisites. It helped first to feel heard, cared for, respected, seen in the fullness of one’s complexity and even, yes, confusion.
Eighth, and finally, the canvasser was to ask the subject to rate their support for the policy question again. Has our conversation changed your opinion? the canvasser asks. The scholars who helped build up the method call this the “rehearsal of opinion change,” with the subject often lured into “active processing” of their own ideas and stories and background and the cognitive dissonance that might have surfaced. The theory is that political opinions are often hastily formed from scanty information. Following a substantive chat at the door, the subject is encouraged to think more slowly about whether their view comports with their deepest values, with what they know to be true, with their sense of themselves, with their experiences.
(308) For every hundred voters the campaign spoke to about establishing universal health care, including for undocumented immigrants, it moved around eight of them, according to the resulting research published by the scholars Joshua Kallla of Yale and David Broockman of Berkeley.
NB: 8-10% moivement
(311) He [Matthew, a person Cesar the deep canvasser is talking to] was a fount less of political opinnions than of political emotions. He felt betrayed, lied to, ignored, condescended to. Many of those feelings were grounded in the realities of American life. But he then felt a need to assign ideas to these emotions.